Blog Excerpts

Did Shakespeare Really Coin All Those Words?

Writing for The Boston Globe, NYU doctoral candidate Rachael Scarborough King reported on recent studies that cast doubt on the commonly held assumption that William Shakespeare invented many of the words we use today. 

It's a common claim of English classes and Internet listicles alike: William Shakespeare, English literature’s most canonical author, invented hundreds if not thousands of the words in our language. Without his plays and poems, we would not know how to swagger, grovel, or gossip, nor could we speak of our employers or our eyeballs—all, supposedly, Shakespearean coinages. From ten-dollar-words like quarrelsome and sanctimonious to everyday terms such as hint and critic, the bard is widely credited with adding immeasurably to our linguistic variety.

But a recent wave of scholarship—driven by computerized quantitative analysis and digital databases that enable searching of thousands of texts at once—is revealing that some of this may be more hype than reality. Shakespeare experts are finding that his vocabulary might not have been so different from that of other writers for the Renaissance stage. The new evidence shows that Shakespeare may have been more a product of his time than the sui generis genius of our cultural mythology.

King goes on to detail the studies, ultimately concluding that a diminution in Shakespeare's reputation as a word smith might actually result in a more authentic response to his work from students and teachers.

If this research reveals that Shakespeare was not so different from his fellow dramatists in quantitative terms, it could actually reinforce his qualitative exceptionality. As Russ McDonald, professor of English literature at Goldsmiths, University of London, wrote in an e-mail, “Knowing that Shakespeare did not invent as many words as we once thought or that his vocabulary was not much different from those of his fellow writers should in no way diminish our admiration for his artistry. Theatrical and literary history attests to his unparalleled use of the same materials as everybody else.”

One effect of digital research in the humanities, it seems, could be to reframe the debate over what makes writers such as Shakespeare so original. By dissolving the myth that his great contribution was to invent English words out of thin air, we are left with a clearer focus on qualities of his work that are less reducible to numbers: namely, the beauty of his writing and the richness of his cultural milieu.

Read King's full piece here. (And for teachers looking for resources in teaching Shakespeare, check out the vocabulary lists in the right-hand column.)


Rate this article:

Click here to read more articles from Blog Excerpts.

Join the conversation

Comments from our users:

Tuesday August 20th 2013, 8:18 AM
Comment by: Mr. P N Sravankumar (India)
cool
Tuesday August 20th 2013, 9:24 AM
Comment by: Chandru S. (Chaska, MN)
and here i was, believing all along for over 60 years, that he knew 14,000 words in english and many he had himself coined and u are busting it in one stroke! dont ask me how i believed he knew 14,000 words. again once of those hand me down stories from one generation to the next. but it did create a mystery around him and it is so nice to see that aura around the bard!
Tuesday August 20th 2013, 9:56 AM
Comment by: David M.
"It's a common claim of English classes and Internet listicles alike..."
"English classes and Internet listicles" cannot be said to claim anything. This sentence should be restructured as: "It's a common claim in English classes and Internet listicles alike..."
Tuesday August 20th 2013, 5:59 PM
Comment by: Sue B.Top 10 Commenter
David M.: It seems to me that the word "of" can describe many relationships, and "arising from" or "found in" is surely a couple of them. In this instance, I don't think the article is asserting what you say that it is. It's sort of like the relationships described by the word "my" (you know, all the way from "my God" to "my left little toe" kind of thing).
Wednesday August 21st 2013, 5:55 PM
Comment by: TheErn (Bedford, TX)
Now what if within the next 100 years or so the real source of Shakespeare's works is finally discovered and validated as thus and so? Would that change things vis-à-vis word creation? Maybe not, but just asking. The Ern.

Do you have a comment?

Share it with the Visual Thesaurus community.

Your comments:

Sign in to post a comment!

We're sorry, you must be a subscriber to comment.

Click here to subscribe today.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login.

A comic tells the story of the Three Little Pigs as it might have sounded during Shakespeare's time.