When we talk about writing style, we mean one of two things: a set of rules and conventions regarding words and punctuation (sometimes known as the "house style" of a given publication); or a distinctive, identifiable way of assembling words and punctuation (sometimes known as "tone" or "voice"). The first kind of style is all about standards: it's why newspaper writers spell out all numerals under ten and why New Yorker editors -- alone of all their tribe -- spell vendor as vender. The second kind of style is about deviations from the standard. It's what makes us recognize a passage of prose as indisputably Ernest Hemingway's or Joan Didion's or David Foster Wallace's or Maureen Dowd's.

I recently read two books that gave me fresh perspectives on both kinds of style. The Elephants of Style, by Washington Post copy chief for national news Bill Walsh, offers "A Trunkload of Tips on the Big Issues and Gray Areas of Contemporary American English." (The title is a puckish jab at the biggest elephant in the room, the excessively revered The Elements of Style by Strunk and White, now in its gazillionth printing.) Walsh, who also writes the edifying Blogslot blog, is both opinionated and entertaining, which makes Elephants a reference book you'll actually want to read (and perhaps even take to heart). On "lies your English teacher told you" -- never split an infinitive, never end a sentence with a preposition, never begin a sentence with a conjunction, etc. -- Walsh writes: "Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong." On spelling: "If you're looking for all-purpose guidelines on spelling beyond 'look it up,' keep in mind that we're dealing with English here." On jargon: "We all know that radio ad salespeople are the coolest people in the world, but do we have to talk like them? Market is not an all-purpose synonym for metropolitan area."

Walsh devotes an entire chapter to commas and hyphens and titles it "The Adventures of Curly and Stitch." Little Curly is a troublemaker: for proof, observe the epidemic of comma splices (joining two sentences with a mere comma when a period or semicolon is called for). There are rules, and Walsh generously shares them, but there are also gray areas. Consider, for example, the difference in effect between "Of course, you will be allowed to use the restroom" (which Walsh says has a "by the way" quality) and "Of course I need to use the restroom!" (more emphatic, and not only because of the exclamation mark).

It's those gray areas that interest Ben Yagoda in The Sound on the Page, an irresistible hybrid of advice, inspiration, and surprise. (Yagoda is also the author of a book on the parts of speech, When You Catch an Adjective, Kill It.) Like Walsh, Yagoda is interested in commas, but for different reasons. "Generally speaking," he writes, "commas are the best punctuational style gauge because a good deal of the time, even within the rules of standard English, they are optional."

Not surprisingly [Yagoda continues], the house style of the New Yorker magazine mandates the serial comma. This is the publication where, as [New Yorker contributor and Elements of Style co-author] E.B. White once said, "commas ... fall with precision of knives in a circus act, outlining the victim."

English writers, Yagoda adds, "tend to use fewer discretionary commas than do Americans, with their weakness for literalness and their ambiguity complex." But British writers at all levels of professionalism seem awfully fond of comma splices. I've been reading the excellent novels of British writer Kate Atkinson, who is profligate with comma splices. (I don't think she uses a semicolon anywhere in her prose.) I can't tell whether comma splices are considered kosher in Scotland, where Atkinson lives, or whether this is one of Atkinson's stylistic idiosyncrasies. As Atkinson might write: I was annoyed at first, I've gotten used to it.

Elsewhere in The Sound on the Page you'll learn the Greek and Roman approaches to style ("To Demosthenes, the three most important things in oratory were locution, locution, and locution") and also what Dave Barry has to say on the subject ("Humor is two things: the joke and the timing. I'm fanatical about whether to use but or although because of the timing. Or should I change a number like 853 to a number like 2,040? Which is funnier? Which one is big enough to be really stupid, without being too big? I spend a lot of time thinking about things like that").

And you'll also learn the Big Secret of acquiring a writing style: imitation. This is hardly a recent trend: Benjamin Franklin taught himself to become what he called "a tolerable English writer," Yagoda tells us, "by attempting to reproduce, from memory, articles he had read in the Spectator; sometimes he would render them in verse, and then turn them back to prose." Yagoda endorses not only imitation but copying as a writing exercise: "[B]ecause it forces you to slow down, simply copying a passage is a great way--much better than mere reading--of internalizing an author's sensibility and cadences." He's a fan of memorization, too (as am I):

Give this a try with authors to whom you're drawn. It will attune you to the literary-speech ratio in their style; it will help you feel their rhythms; it might clue you in to their characteristic clinkers. At the very least, it will help pass the time when you're waiting for a plane to lift off.

Imitate, copy, memorize--but don't stop there. At some point, you've got to take what you've absorbed and turn it into something original. And that's the real fun of writing.


Rate this article:

Click here to read more articles from Candlepower.

Nancy Friedman is the chief wordworker at verbal-branding consultancy Wordworking, and the author of a fine blog on naming, branding and more called Fritinancy. Nancy has named a venture-capital firm, a laser hair-removal device, a mobile-money service, and many other companies and products. A former journalist, she still writes or ghostwrites articles, speeches, white papers, and books. Click here to read more articles by Nancy Friedman.

Join the conversation

Comments from our users:

Monday May 14th 2007, 3:52 AM
Comment by: Tom S.
I can't say I've read any of her books, but surely Atkinson would write "I was annoyed at first, I've *got* used to it."?
Monday May 14th 2007, 10:29 AM
Comment by: Noël P.
Oh! Thank goodness someone else has noted the odd (though correct) spelling of 'vendor' as 'vender' in the NYer. It gives me the twitches every time!
Monday May 14th 2007, 11:01 AM
Comment by: Magda Pecsenye
I had no idea that this comma splice thing was gaining momentum. It's going to take me years and years to get over it, if I ever do. Sigh.

Tom, ha! Yes.

Lou, Friedman said that both Hemingway and Dowd have distinctive writing styles. That's all. How does that have anything to do with political affiliation? And why would you think it was appropriate to insult someone gratuitously on something completely off-topic, even if you don't share their political views? (BTW, by failing the test of basic reading comprehension and posting from the hip on a public forum, you're leaving *yourself* wide open for attack. Live by the "Submit" button and die by the "Submit" button, comrade.)

Great article, Nancy. It made me want to run out and buy all the books you mention.
Monday May 14th 2007, 9:29 PM
Comment by: E. Mike S.
Tom and Magda, "The American Heritage Dictionary" (4th edition) lists gotten or got as equal variants of the past participle. I'm not sure if Ms. Atkinson would write "I've got used to it" or "I've gotten used to it" (it's actually Ms. Friedman's construction anyway), but both seem acceptable; and the latter has the advantage of keeping the iambic rhythm intact.

Paul Brians, author of "Common Errors in English" and recently featured here at VT, has some interesting things to say about got/gotten. You can check it out here: http://wsu.edu/~brians/errors/got.html.

Lou, I can't say it any better than how Magda said it.

Ms. Friedman, I enjoyed your article and will check out the books you mentioned. Perhaps one reason that justifies the occasional comma splice is sentence rhythm. Sometimes, a semicolon just seems too long a stop, approximating the full stop of the period. The common, a half-stop, simply keeps things moving along.
Tuesday May 15th 2007, 5:40 AM
Comment by: Jack B.
All this is too heavy of course.
Tuesday May 15th 2007, 8:31 AM
Comment by: Donald R.
I think a lot in this area simply depends upon the writer's efforts and intent to be somewhat creative, so that the reader gets the message or purpose of the writer's efforts, and conceivably even enjoys the read. I enjoy business writing that communicates the message,information, statement, request, etc, and I have taken certain, but not substantial liberties concerning punctuation and grammatic "rules" for years. But,to add interest to the writing, not to be cute. Even in the at times comparatively dull world of engineering, I still have people comment that they a) got the point, and b) enjoyed the writing. However, my wife,a rules advocate, disagrees.
Tuesday May 15th 2007, 9:43 AM
Comment by: Tom S.
Mike,

The OED lists "gotten" as the AmE past participle and "got" as the the BrE past participle and the past for both. I don't want to knock the AHD, but unless I'm mistaken, it does restrict itself to only one variety (or rather family of varieties) of English.

I'd say that British writers generally only use "gotten" for stylistic purposes (let's bring this a little bit more back on topic!), either to purposefully make a sentence more "American" or perhaps in the construction "gotten away with it" (usually followed by a variant of "if it wasn't for you pesky kids").

Tom (an Englishman in Paris)
Tuesday May 15th 2007, 3:48 PM
Comment by: E. Mike S.
Tom,

Yes, you're right; the AHD is largely a dictionary of American English and thus limited in scope. Although it contains some Briticisms and offers some British variants, it is in no way as complete as the OED. I should have remembered that the "A" in AHD stands for American and not assumed that readers of these comments were necessarily American. I suppose this means that my home in Smallville, USA, is not the center of the universe?

Thanks for the explanation from the OED, which may be the center of the English language universe; its painstaking entries clarify much. So, according to the OED, "gotten" is AmE and "got" BrE? Hmmm, sounds misbegotten to me.

Mike S. (an American unfortunately not in Paris)
Saturday May 19th 2007, 11:53 AM
Comment by: MARK W.
Thank you, I enjoyed the article and links.
Does anyone know why the NYer insists upon vendER?

Regarding semicolons,(;!)my old English teacher always used to say "If you need a semicolon, you need a new sentence".

Anyway,kind regards to all.

Mark (an Englishman down-under. I'm not sure about my up-over bits).

Do you have a comment?

Share it with the Visual Thesaurus community.

Your comments:

Sign in to post a comment!

We're sorry, you must be a subscriber to comment.

Click here to subscribe today.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login.