Word Count
Writers Talk About Writing
Grammar Bite: Making Subjects and Verbs Agree
Subject-verb agreement sounds easy, doesn't it? A singular subject takes singular verb:
- Tom rides his bike to work every day.
A plural subject takes a plural verb:
- The boys are climbing the walls like caged animals.
Yet The Copyeditor's Handbook lists no fewer than 25 cases that aren't so clear-cut, and Garner's Modern American Usage devotes nearly 5 columns to the topic. Even the comparatively diminutive Grammar Smart devotes five pages (including quizzes) to the topic. What makes subject-verb agreement so hard?
One thing that trips up writers is a long, complicated subject. The writer gets lost in it and forgets which noun is actually the head of the subject phrase and instead makes the verb agree with the nearest noun:
- The arrival of new fall fashions have excited all the back-to-school shoppers.
(should be has to agree with arrival)
Another trap for writers is the trend away from strict grammatical agreement toward notional agreement, that is the verb agrees with the notion the subject is trying to get across, whether it's singular or plural:
- Twenty-five rules is a lot to digest.
- Twenty-five rules are listed on the notice.
And then there's the fact that English just refuses to fit neatly into a box and stay there. If English can take a left turn when you thought it would go straight, it does.
Here, then, is a brief rundown of 10 nuances of subject-verb agreement.
A subject made up of nouns joined by and takes a plural subject, unless that subject's intended sense is singular.
- She and I run every day.
- Peanut butter and jelly is my favorite sandwich.
When a subject is made up of nouns joined by or, the verb agrees with the last noun.
- She or I run every day.
- Potatoes, pasta, or rice pairs well with grilled chicken.
Collective nouns (team, couple, staff, etc.) take either a singular or plural verb, depending on whether the emphasis is on the individual units or on the group as whole.
- The football team is practicing night and day for the Super Bowl.
- Boston's school committee disagree about what to cut from the school budget.
Connectives, phrases such as combined with, coupled with, accompanied by, added to, along with, together with, and as well as, do not change the number of the subject. These phrases are usually set off with commas.
- Oil, as well as gas, is a popular heating choice.
- Peanut butter combined with bread and jelly is a tasty snack.
(Here, the peanut butter, bread, and jelly are one unit, a sandwich, so no commas are needed and we keep the singular verb.)
Collecting noun phrases (a bunch of, a group of, a set of, etc.) take either a singular or plural verb, depending on whether the emphasis is on the individual units or on the group as whole:
- A group of boys were digging in my flower beds!
- A set of 12 dishes is all you need for the dinner party.
Each takes a singular verb.
- Each boy is excited about the meet; each is well prepared.
None takes a singular verb if what it refers to is singular and a plural verb if its referent is plural.
- None of the peas are left on Sean's plate.
- None of the book is reproducible without permission.
With fractions, the verb agrees with the whole.
- One-fourth of the books are gone.
- One-fourth of the sand is white.
With money, if the amount is specific, use a singular verb; if the amount is vague, use a plural verb.
- Within a year, $5 million was spent on building a new factory, and millions more were spent on training future factory workers.
The phrase more than one takes a singular verb (yes, I know that doesn't sound logical; try to remember that one is followed by something, whether explicitly or implicitly).
- More than one box is sitting in the hallway.
- More than one is sitting in the hallway.
Have a specific question on subject-verb agreement? Let me know in the comments below!


Join the conversation
Comments from our users:
None of the boys is leaving.
None of the boys are leaving.
Can't both sentences be correct? If the first 'none' means 'not one' then 'is' is correct, I think, but it might need an expanded sentence to clarify that.
However...
According to the rule given in the article, the second is always correct.
Also, what do you make of this sentence, Erin?
"But human ingenuity and intelligence, plus what may amount to an instinct for symbolism, comes to the rescue" (Dwight Bolinger, Language - The Loaded Weapon [1980], p. 56).
It combines two of the rules you've listed (numbers 1 and 4), and it seems to flout rule number 1 (can "ingenuity and intelligence" really be intended as a singular?).
A subject made up of nouns joined by and takes a plural subject, unless that subject's intended sense is singular.
She and I run every day (sense is singular: run is the singular verb)
If you break the subject up:
I run every day (sense is singular: run is the singular verb)
She runs every day (sense is singular: runs is the ????)
One thing great about this forum: you can sound stupid; but not look stupid.
But isn't both she and I singular. So in the sentence "I run every day," and "she runs every day"; it seems the verb form is used differently for both singulars.
I haven't tested that, but it isn't a case of changing from singular to plural. They are both singular, just different person. And I suspect it's a case of agreement with the subject closest to the verb.
Not tested, though! LOL
I love trying to figure out the ins and outs of language, the tiny little picky points, like how they form plurals (some have a form for two, and then many), the Romance languages and their case with nouns and a preceding word... la femme, etc...
The why of what they do is is fascinating.
Anonymous, the subject of your sentence is "human ingenuity and intelligence," which would take the plural "come" as a verb. The phrase "plus what may amount to an instinct for symbolism" is surrounded by commas, making it parenthetical. That is, it isn't a necessary part of the sentence and isn't considered part of the subject. If we removed the commas, the whole subject becomes "human ingenuity and intelligence plus what may amount to an instinct for symbolism" and would still take a plural verb. The result is long and clunky, however. I'd probably rewrite it as "But human ingenuity, intelligence, and what may amount to an instinct for symbolism come..."
Kip, In "She and I run every day," the sense is plural. The two of us are both running, but we don't have to be running together. Maybe she runs in the morning before work, and I run in the evenings after work. "Run" is also the first person plural form of "to run." It breaks out this way:
I run.
You run.
She runs. He runs. It runs.
We run.
You run.
They run.
Make sense?
Ditto!
But I love the dialogue and interaction.