Word Count

Writers Talk About Writing

It's a Number! It's a Word! It's Both!

A friend of mine recently alerted me to an odd type of "word." See if you can guess what the following mean:

  • l10n
  • i18n
  • d11n

Yeah, me neither. These are some examples of a lexical hybrid that goes by the name numeronym. If you've never heard of it, that's because it's a term that's not yet appearing in any major dictionaries. (This also means that there's no registered pronunciation. I'm personally inclined to pronounce it as noo-MER-o-nim.)

In the broadest definition, a numeronym is a word that involves numbers. The term actually covers several types of number-based constructs. For example, one source says that the term was originally used to describe words based on telephone numbers, like 1-800-PLUMBER.

Another type of numeronym is probably familiar — a word in which the number is just a phonetic replacement for some of the letters. For example, there's K-9 for canine, and we've all seen brand names (not necessarily good ones) in which a digit appears phonetically: tr8n.net, Roth2U, Vital 4U, 2nite vodka. The language of texting is big on this type of numeronym: gr8 for great, l8r for later, 1ce for once, etc.

Then there's a type of numeronym in which the number really does represent a number but appears as part of an abbreviation. Some examples are WWI and WWII for those particular conflicts, and G8 and G20 for the economic summit meetings involving those respective numbers of countries. A slight variation on this is the term Y2K, where 2K stands for 2000 of the famous Year 2000 problem that never appeared.

The terms 24/7 and 180 or 360 (e.g., I did a 180) are considered by some to be numeronyms. Whether these really qualify depends perhaps on how metonymously one wants to interpret the term. Similar examples might be 411 for information or 10-4 (derived from radio talk) for ok.

But if you go looking for numeronyms these days, the standard example— if "standard" can be applied to this particular term — is something like the words at the beginning of the article. These are, for lack of a better description, words that use numbers algorithmically. It'll be clear when I show you what those numeronyms actually stand for:

  • l10n: localization
  • i18n: internationalization
  • d11n: documentation

As you can see, these numeronyms are formed by including the first letter, the last letter (optional), and a digit to represent the number of letters in between. There are now all kinds of examples of this type of numeronym: c14n (canonicalization), i14y (interoperability), p13n (personalization), n11n (normalization). Almost all of these are computer terms. (Should you be wondering, the non-numeronym versions of these words are widely used in IT, odd as they might seem.) There are just a few examples from other fields; easily the best one is E15 for Eyjafjallajökull, the Icelandic volcano of recent fame. Supposedly P45 is used as a numeronym for the made-up word Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis. (Our own Ben Zimmer mentioned P45 and i18l in a blog post on the Oxford University Press blog some years ago, in fact.)

There's an excellent origin story for this type of numeronym. It involves the erstwhile computer manufacturer Digital Equipment Company. Here's the tale as it appears in the Tutor Gig online encyclopedia:

… the first numeronym of this kind was "S12n", the electronic mail account name given to Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) employee Jan Scherpenhuizen by a system administrator because his surname was too long to be an account name. Colleagues who found Jan's name unpronounceable often referred to him verbally as "S12n". The use of such numeronyms became part of DEC corporate culture.

This explanation is not dated, but discussion of similar terms (like those I listed) suggests that this type of numeronym has been in use since about the mid-80s and almost certainly spread out from DEC to other parts of the computer world.

Some people might think that these types of algorithmic numeronyms are the result of laziness. Certainly there's no way you can tell what any of these terms represent unless someone clues you in. But really it's just a matter of convenience. Consider this story told by an old-timer in the computer industry:

At one point in one of the early meetings, someone was writing the long "internationalization" word yet again on the white board. Since we didn't like writing this long word all the time, someone suggested we find an abbreviation. After some discussion (I don't know if the idea was borrowed from somewhere else), the suggestion of "i18n" was agreed upon and since then that SIG "standardized" upon it.

You can certainly sympathize with the person holding the whiteboard marker. Or for that matter, the journalist assigned to write about the Icelandic volcano.

Shortening cumbersome words has a more contemporary benefit as well. With the 140-character limit imposed by Twitter, people have started to find numeronyms handy in their tweets. The translator Luke Spear recently noted on his website that he was proud of having invented the compact and now widespread hashtag #xl8 to stand for translate. (In this case, of course, the x signifies trans.)

I was slightly surprised to discover that there's one numeronym that I use quite frequently in my work at Microsoft: W3C. This stands for the World Wide Web Consortium, which is the governing body for the Web. This term appears all over the documentation that I deal with every day.

W3C notwithstanding, I don't think we'll be using any of the more abstruse numeronyms in the documentation. But if I run across one now and then, at least I'll know what it's called.

Rate this article:

Click here to read more articles from Word Count.

Mike Pope has been a technical writer and editor for nearly 30 years. He has worked at several software companies, including Microsoft, and currently works in Amazon's cloud computing division. You can read more at Mike's Web Log and Evolving English II. Click here to read more articles by Mike Pope.

Join the conversation

Comments from our users:

Wednesday February 29th 2012, 3:02 AM
Comment by: Marjorie D.
WOW!!! I'll never learn all these!!!
Wednesday February 29th 2012, 4:06 AM
Comment by: Roger Dee (Haslett, MI)Top 10 Commenter
Don't forget the TV program of the 60's, TW3 (That Was The Week That Was). It didn't last, but I did!
Wednesday February 29th 2012, 11:20 AM
Comment by: Geoff A. (United Kingdom)Top 10 Commenter
I2t t2s w1y S1r I3c P4n i6d h1s s7d?
Wednesday February 29th 2012, 11:29 AM
Comment by: Kristine F.Top 10 Commenter
First of all, let's agree to use "a18n" for "algorithmic numeronym" (yes, I know there's a space there. I'm ignoring it). Now, moving on, apparently the first word that is represented by a new a18n, if it has a substantive following, becomes the official definition of the term. If someone else wants to use a18n to abbreviate a different word with the same first and last letters and the same number of letters in between, I guess they're just out of luck. Is that fair? I think not.

I have a solution: In those cases we could add another number, at the end of the a18m. Thus, documentation is "d11n", determination could be "d11n2", dorkification could be "d11n3" and so on. It would be nice if that last number could be a Roman numeral, but in sans serif fonts the upper case "i" doesnt look like the Roman numeral one (I tried). How about putting the number above the line, as we do for exponents/factors, or below the line, as we do for numbers of each kind of atoms in a molecule? Same problem; that's not always possible or easy on a computer (obviously "83" doesn't mean "eight to the third power" and "H2O" doesn't work for "water").

I guess we could put a hyphen or something to separate the a18n from the number of the definition ... but I believe my work here is done. I'll leave the particulars to all of you who read this and choose to express your opinions.

The Happy Quibbler
Wednesday February 29th 2012, 11:43 AM
Comment by: Kristine F.Top 10 Commenter
Geoff, I'm working on it! How can we tell if "l" is a lower case "L" (l) or an upper-case "i" (I) ... are you using capital letters to begin a new sentence?

The Happy Quibbler
Wednesday February 29th 2012, 1:17 PM
Comment by: Mike P. (Seattle, WA)Visual Thesaurus Contributor
Geoff, I think that for P4n you meant N4n -- ? :-)
Wednesday February 29th 2012, 4:29 PM
Comment by: Jamie Lingwood (Amsterdam Netherlands)
Still trying to get my own numeronym into common usage... t10n = transcreation. (Failing miserably! LOL)
Wednesday February 29th 2012, 4:40 PM
Comment by: Jamie Lingwood (Amsterdam Netherlands)
I did of course mean t11n in my post above ... problem with numeronyms — you have to be able to count as well as spell! LOL
Wednesday February 29th 2012, 5:13 PM
Comment by: Geoff A. (United Kingdom)Top 10 Commenter
Actually, it would be a good puzzle on a newspaper's puzzle page, wouldn't it?

Kristine, I've used standard punctuation.

S1r can only be the word Sir can't it? So I'm referring to a knight of the Queen's realm. Sir Somebody Somebody. I suppose this isn't so obvious to people who have thrown off the yoke of monarchy!

Mike, a taste of my own medecine! I'm totally flummoxed, which is frustrating since yours is evidently a humorous comment! I look forward to sharing the :-)

Anyway, I was saying:

Isn't this why Sir Isaac Pitman invented his shorthand?

And Jamie, you're dead right - I had to have several recounts! It's a bit like that test where the word 'red' is printed in blue ink, 'green' in red ink, and so forth, and you have to read them quickly.

TW3 is a great, if n7c, example for us oldies!
Wednesday February 29th 2012, 5:25 PM
Comment by: Marjorie D.
I was never any good at maths ... Thats why I write!!!
Wednesday February 29th 2012, 6:02 PM
Comment by: Mike P. (Seattle, WA)Visual Thesaurus Contributor
Aha! I was sure you meant Newton, not Pitman. Which meant I could not get "shorthand" for the life of me.
Wednesday February 29th 2012, 9:16 PM
Comment by: Ferial E R (Woodbridge United Kingdom)
It might be quick to write it...it takes a darn sight longer to decipher it! That is if I havn't given up mid-way

Wednesday June 6th 2012, 11:45 AM
Comment by: cheth C. (Siem Reap Cambodia)
I learn more words today.
Friday June 8th 2012, 3:59 PM
Comment by: Nina R.
This is soo confusing! I once thought that sk8 was bad enough.
Saturday June 9th 2012, 4:39 AM
Comment by: Marjorie D.
Mmmmmmmmmmmmm Still confused!!

Do you have a comment?

Share it with the Visual Thesaurus community.

Your comments:

Sign in to post a comment!

We're sorry, you must be a subscriber to comment.

Click here to subscribe today.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login.