WORD LISTS

Supreme Court healthcare ruling

June 28, 2012
Vocabulary from the Plain English summary of the Supreme Court's ruling upholding the Affordable Care Act.

The Affordable Care Act, including its individual mandate that virtually all Americans buy health insurance, is constitutional. There were not five votes to uphold it on the ground that Congress could use its power to regulate commerce between the states to require everyone to buy health insurance. However, five Justices agreed that the penalty that someone must pay if he refuses to buy insurance is a kind of tax that Congress can impose using its taxing power. That is all that matters. Because the mandate survives, the Court did not need to decide what other parts of the statute were constitutional, except for a provision that required states to comply with new eligibility requirements for Medicaid or risk losing their funding.
include
The Affordable Care Act, including its individual mandate that virtually all Americans buy health insurance, is constitutional.
individual
The Affordable Care Act, including its individual mandate that virtually all Americans buy health insurance, is constitutional.
mandate
The Affordable Care Act, including its individual mandate that virtually all Americans buy health insurance, is constitutional.
virtually
The Affordable Care Act, including its individual mandate that virtually all Americans buy health insurance, is constitutional.
health
The Affordable Care Act, including its individual mandate that virtually all Americans buy health insurance, is constitutional.
insurance
The Affordable Care Act, including its individual mandate that virtually all Americans buy health insurance, is constitutional.
constitutional
The Affordable Care Act, including its individual mandate that virtually all Americans buy health insurance, is constitutional.
uphold
There were not five votes to uphold it on the ground that Congress could use its power to regulate commerce between the states to require everyone to buy health insurance.
congress
There were not five votes to uphold it on the ground that Congress could use its power to regulate commerce between the states to require everyone to buy health insurance.
regulate
There were not five votes to uphold it on the ground that Congress could use its power to regulate commerce between the states to require everyone to buy health insurance.
commerce
There were not five votes to uphold it on the ground that Congress could use its power to regulate commerce between the states to require everyone to buy health insurance.
require
There were not five votes to uphold it on the ground that Congress could use its power to regulate commerce between the states to require everyone to buy health insurance.
justice
However, five Justices agreed that the penalty that someone must pay if he refuses to buy insurance is a kind of tax that Congress can impose using its taxing power.
refuse
However, five Justices agreed that the penalty that someone must pay if he refuses to buy insurance is a kind of tax that Congress can impose using its taxing power.
impose
However, five Justices agreed that the penalty that someone must pay if he refuses to buy insurance is a kind of tax that Congress can impose using its taxing power.
survive
Because the mandate survives, the Court did not need to decide what other parts of the statute were constitutional, except for a provision that required states to comply with new eligibility requirements for Medicaid or risk losing their funding.
court
Because the mandate survives, the Court did not need to decide what other parts of the statute were constitutional, except for a provision that required states to comply with new eligibility requirements for Medicaid or risk losing their funding.
statute
Because the mandate survives, the Court did not need to decide what other parts of the statute were constitutional, except for a provision that required states to comply with new eligibility requirements for Medicaid or risk losing their funding.
provision
Because the mandate survives, the Court did not need to decide what other parts of the statute were constitutional, except for a provision that required states to comply with new eligibility requirements for Medicaid or risk losing their funding.
comply
Because the mandate survives, the Court did not need to decide what other parts of the statute were constitutional, except for a provision that required states to comply with new eligibility requirements for Medicaid or risk losing their funding.
requirement
Because the mandate survives, the Court did not need to decide what other parts of the statute were constitutional, except for a provision that required states to comply with new eligibility requirements for Medicaid or risk losing their funding.
risk
Because the mandate survives, the Court did not need to decide what other parts of the statute were constitutional, except for a provision that required states to comply with new eligibility requirements for Medicaid or risk losing their funding.
funding
Because the mandate survives, the Court did not need to decide what other parts of the statute were constitutional, except for a provision that required states to comply with new eligibility requirements for Medicaid or risk losing their funding.
funds
On that question, the Court held that the provision is constitutional as long as states would only lose new funds if they didn't comply with the new requirements, rather than all of their funding.

Rate this wordlist:

Join the conversation

Comments from our users:

Tuesday September 11th 2012, 7:25 PM
Comment by: Molly E.
This is poorly written - in clarity, flow, and style. You also have not provided a proper citation. Elsewhere, this is credited to SCOTUSblog.com, but I believe the person addressing the issue was Amy Howe. Oddly though, none of her writing on the subject reflects the wording here. She, by contrast, seems to have a good command of the English language as a science and an art. I have provided her with a copy of the above and all other pertinent links. She may have written and posted this quickly as a first draft, which would account for the poorer quality. Regardless, she should have the opportunity to communicate her expectation this be properly cited or, elsewhere, to pursue and disassociate her name from writing which does not meet her usual standards.
Sunday April 21st, 6:30 AM
Comment by: Manisha C.
ok

Do you have a comment?

Share it with the Visual Thesaurus community.

Your comments:

Sign in to post a comment!

We're sorry, you must be a subscriber to comment.

Click here to subscribe today.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login.

Create a new Word List