Word Count
Writers Talk About Writing
Do You Know Your Alfa-Bravo-Charlies?

Mike Pope, a technical editor at Microsoft, writes:
My name — Pope — is surprisingly easy to mishear. "Polk?" people ask. "Hope?" This is particularly true over the telephone. Even spelling it out doesn't help — P-O-P-E — and I find myself exaggerating the aspiration on those plosives.
This might be one reason that I've developed an interest in the idea of so-called spelling alphabets (frequently referred to, incorrectly, as phonetic alphabets). A spelling alphabet consists of words (Alfa, Bravo, Charlie, Delta, etc.) that represent alphabetic characters. Even if you've never been in the military or gotten a radio license or studied flying, you've probably heard people use a spelling alphabet on TV or in a movie.
As you can imagine, spelling alphabets were developed for precisely the reason I noted — spelling out loud is fraught, what with all the letters that sound similar (e.g., B, E, P, T, D) and the many vagaries of auditory communication. Since the military is very interested in communication, and because they often work under auditorially challenging conditions (such as, say, during battle), spelling alphabets have mostly come from the military.
Initial attempts in the British Army in the 19th century simply assigned alternative names to letters that were frequently misheard. This was an early version:
Ack Beer C D E F G H I J K L Emma N O Pip Q R Esses Toc U Vic W X Y Z
The idea was further developed with the spread of radio technology. (As those of us of a certain age can remember, pre-digital radio was notoriously subject to static and interference.) Signaling individual letters had of course long been established in the navy, and so spelling alphabets evolved to have a distinct word for each letter.
Imagine for a moment that you've been assigned to come up with a phonetic alphabet for English. Your alphabet must use simple, short words. It must also use words that are phonetically distinct from one another. For example, you wouldn't want to use A=Able and T=Table or B=Bear and F=Fare (or Fair).
One of the early English phonetic alphabets (from 1913) used these words:
Able | Have | Oboe | Vice |
Boy | Item | Pup | Watch |
Cast | Jig | Quack | X-ray |
Easy | Love | Sail | Zed |
Fox | Mike | Tare | |
George | Nan | Unit |
Spelling alphabets evolved independently in different branches of the military and in different countries. During WWII, for example, the US military used a spelling alphabet that began with Able-Baker-Charlie, which might be familiar still to people who went through that conflict (or who love movies set in that time period). Over time it became obvious that it would be useful to standardize on a single such alphabet. After WWII, American and Western European countries settled on what's known as the NATO phonetic alphabet (as I say, not a correct term). This was adopted in the 1950s and is still standard today; here are the letters:
Alfa | Hotel | Oscar | Victor |
Bravo | India | Papa | Whiskey |
Charlie | Juliett | Quebec | X-ray |
Delta | Kilo | Romeo | Yankee |
Echo | Lima | Sierra | Zulu |
Foxtrot | Mike | Tango | |
Golf | November | Uniform |
The challenge in developing the alphabet was to meet the criteria I listed earlier and to use words that non-English speakers would be able to speak and understand and that that did not have wildly different pronunciations in different languages. An additional challenge was to accommodate letters that were not in English. To that purpose, there are language-specific versions of this alphabet (like German) that have extra words for letters like ä, ö, and ü.
As I've been learning this, it struck me that the current alphabet consists almost entirely of multi-syllabic words; contrast this alphabet with the earlier one above. Another notable feature is that most of the words are disyllable trochees (AL-pha, BRA-vo, CHAR-lie, etc.). This was particularly noticeable to me as I was learning the alphabet, because exceptions — Golf, Hotel, November — were harder to learn and had an odd effect on the rhythm of the spelling. But the current selection of words is understandable as the result of the internationalization effort. For example, Golf is, I assume, a more recognizable term internationally than George.
There has been some small influence of spelling alphabets in everyday English. The famous "Checkpoint Charlie" in the days of the Berlin Wall was actually Checkpoint C. The derogatory military slang term Charlie to refer to the Viet Cong is said to come from Victor Charlie. The term Roger to mean gotcha comes from a spelling alphabet in use in the 20s and 30s, in which it stood for the letter R, which in turn was shorthand for "received." Along similar lines, Wilco is spelling-alphabet shorthand for the W in will comply. Zulu time (from the Z in zone) is jargon for GMT. Some people might remember the TV series Adam-12, where the "Adam" in the name derives from a spelling alphabet used by police forces.
For ordinary civilians (like me), learning a spelling alphabet has limited applicability in everyday life. I would like to imagine myself telling someone over the phone that my name is "Papa-Oscar-Papa-Echo", but I'm pretty sure that most people on the other end of the phone would just find this bewildering, unless I happen to be talking to someone with radio military or piloting experience. It does provide an interesting distraction during traffic jams, where I wile away the time reading the license plates of my fellow drivers. But should I ever decide to get a radio license or become a pilot, I'm ready to spell away.
Join the conversation
Comments from our users:
The military has a way of coming up with spare, elegant descriptions of situations have gone awry: those of WWII will recognize FUBAR (fouled up beyond all recognition); the term of art in the armed services these days is a cluster f***, the spoken version rendered "a charlie foxtrot".
There are local variants of the alphabet which have much charm: in Italy the mundane "delta" is often rendered as "Domodossola" which allows for a dramatic rendering (verbally)and leaves one in no doubt the the letter D is what is being indicated.
In my career saying 'able', 'baker', 'charlie' (or 'chuck' for short), 'dog', 'easy', 'fox' is as natural as one two three.
But if I need to sound out a word rather than sounding out a number its tango oscar uniform golf hotel to remember all the other letters.
I live on D Street in Petaluma, and when asked for my address, I say, "D as in David." I can't tell you the number of people who confirm it as "David Street."
NATO would spell : Napoli, Arezzo, Torino, Olbia
It is then more difficult to spell cities with W or Z which hardly exist in Italy, but those letters are scarce as well in the italian language.
Use of alphabet such as B for Boy, E for Echo, G for Girl, U for Umbrella, M for Monkey. The person at the other end of line doesn't make any mistake figuring out what I'm pronouncing. On the other hand if I spell my name clearly and high tone even hundred times no luck.
Roger, Alpha, Alpha, Charlie!
As for the extra letters (the ones without a city or other word like 'hotel'), they are simply pronounced: Y=ypsilon, W=doppio vu, X=ix, J=i lunga (long I), k=kappa.
When I was in high school in the US, my dad had access to a small Cessna with 2WR in its name. I loved hearing him call it down to the tower, and "Two-whiskey Romeo" became a term my friends and I used for a kind of guy to watch out for, a romantic when under the influence. :-)
This is also the reason why young children are not taught the name of letters like American kids, as it would make it harder for them to learn how to read – they are taught that P is /p/ rather than /pi:/, N is /n/ rather than /enne/ so when they see the word PANE they know they should read it /'pane/, P-A-N-E.
We might use the spelling alphabet over the phone, e.g. when making reservations, or in any other "official" situations.
I agree it could be useful to not learn the names of the letters right away, to avoid confusion with the sounds, but in my opinion they ought to learn them fairly soon afterwards at least. It sounds rather pitiful to hear a child of 9 or 10 or even later unsure what the names of the letters are, and calling them by sound instead. In any case my bilingual kids seemed to have no trouble distinguishing between the names of letters (in Italian and English) and their sounds (in Italian and English). Children’s intelligence should not be underestimated, their brains are more capable than ours of learning things like language and natural math concepts.
I used to teach English to groups of children after school, and the first thing we always did was the alphabet song. They were always suprised they could learn the alphabet in the space of an hour (singing in another language!), and they were the only kids in elementary school who managed to use a dictionary efficiently, because they knew by heart the order of the letters. They’ve told me they still used to sing the alphabet song to themselves in high school…
Italian being phonetic can make dyslexia more difficult to see—at least if you are not looking for it. There was a girl in my after-school English group who had a reputation for being very slow in school. I realized she could take dictation perfectly (write down the sounds, one after another) and had a wonderful ear, but could not copy the words in front of her. I was lucky the newspaper had just printed a very good article on the condition, making it easy to explain to her parents, because in the early 90s most teachers still seemed completely ignorant about it (and far too willing to attribute learning troubles to “laziness”).
Having seen kids go through school in a culture different from mine has let me see how much expectations count. In Italy all kids are expected to learn to read and to write in cursive by Christmas of first grade, and so most them really do, with lots of extra help from parents if they are having difficulties. But on the other hand, for some mysterious reason math is treated as a “difficult” subject by far too many teachers, and so the parents are told that their kids are “bad at math”, when actually it is the teacher who hasn’t learned to teach it.
Later, if your child is good in school and goes to Liceo Classico for high school, it is taken for granted that they will become competent in both Greek and Latin, reading aloud, translating and commenting original texts (yes, they learn the Greek alphabet in their very first week!). If a student is not doing well in both Greek and Latin, they may have to repeat the year. English, on the other hand, is also studied for 5 years, but no one seems concerned if the kids are not learning to speak it nor read it (not at my daughter’s illustrious school, anyway),not because it is not considered important, it is, but because, as everyone knows, foreign languages are very very difficult to learn!