Word Routes

Exploring the pathways of our lexicon

Emoticons at 30 (Or Is It 45? Or 125? Or 131?)

This week, there have been many celebrations of the 30th anniversary of the emoticon, the now-ubiquitous use of punctuation marks to mark emotion in online text. On September 19, 1982, at 11:44 a.m., Scott Fahlman posted a message to a Carnegie Mellon bulletin board, proposing that :-) be used for marking jokes and :-( for non-jokes. Though Fahlman should get full credit for these pioneering smiley and frowny faces, there were in fact much earlier pioneers in expressive typography.

Forty-five years ago, in 1967, Reader's Digest suggested that people were already using emoticon-like glyphs in personal correspondence. Barbara Mikkelson provides the passage on the Snopes website:

Many people write letters with strong expression in them, but my Aunt Ev is the only person I know who can write a facial expression. Aunt Ev's expression is a symbol that looks like this: —) It represents her tongue stuck in her cheek. Here's the way she used it in her last letter: "Your Cousin Vernie is a natural blonde again —) Will Wamsley is the new superintendent over at the factory. Marge Pinkleman says they tried to get her husband to take the job —) but he told them he couldn't accept less that $12,000 a year —)
(Reader's Digest, May 1967, p. 160, citing Ralph Reppert of Baltimore's Sunday Sun)

Aunt Ev's tongue-in-cheek symbol seems distantly related to Fahlman's joke marker, as does a suggestion made by Vladimir Nabokov when interviewed by The New York Times two years later:

Q: How do you rank yourself among writers (living) and of the immediate past?
Nabokov: I often think there should exist a special typographical sign for a smile – some sort of concave mark, a supine round bracket, which I would now like to trace in reply to your question.

Nabokov's "supine round bracket" is smiley indeed. But we could just as easily be celebrating the 125th anniversary of the smiley emoticon, because on September 25, 1887, Ambrose Bierce made a similar suggestion in the pages of the San Francisco Examiner. Bierce, who found literary fame as the author of such satirical works as The Devil's Dictionary, had just begun writing his column "Prattle" for The Examiner, under the new management of William Randolph Hearst. (Hearst had been given control of the paper at the tender age of 23, after his father George had purchased it.) In Bierce's column, he proposed introducing "an improvement in punctuation — the snigger point, or note of cachinnation," which would be "appended with the full stop to every jocular or ironical sentence." (Cacchination means "loud, convulsive laughter.") In the newspaper, it was represented by a right parenthesis lying on its side, imitative of a smile, like so:

The section of Bierce's column on the "snigger point" was reprinted far and wide in October and November 1887: by looking in digitized newspaper databases I've found it appearing in such papers as The Chicago Tribune, The Sioux County Herald (Iowa), The Kansas City Times, and The Daily Morning Astorian (Oregon). The following February, in The Traveler's Record (published by the Travelers Insurance Company), Bierce's proposal was warmly embraced.

These other periodicals simply credited The Examiner for the insight, since Bierce was not yet a famous writer; later, in 1912, the complete column appeared (with some revisions) in The Complete Works of Ambrose Bierce, not long before the writer's mysterious disappearance in Mexico.

But even earlier than Bierce, an item in the March 30, 1881 issue of the American humor magazine Puck entitled "Typographical Art" arrayed punctuation marks to create facial expressions of "joy," "melancholy," "indifference," and "astonishment."

Was the anonymous wag in Puck the very first to turn typesetting marks into emotional glyphs? Perhaps so, but further excavations could turn up even more ancient proto-emoticons. The task of making text seem more like our face-to-face interactions has clearly posed a long-standing challenge, and many creative minds have come up with their own independent inventions.

Rate this article:

Click here to read more articles from Word Routes.

Ben Zimmer is language columnist for The Wall Street Journal and former language columnist for The Boston Globe and The New York Times Magazine. He has worked as editor for American dictionaries at Oxford University Press and as a consultant to the Oxford English Dictionary. In addition to his regular "Word Routes" column here, he contributes to the group weblog Language Log. He is also the chair of the New Words Committee of the American Dialect Society. Click here to read more articles by Ben Zimmer.

Join the conversation

Comments from our users:

Friday September 21st 2012, 8:40 PM
Comment by: sandy F.
I really like this article :)
Friday September 21st 2012, 8:49 PM
Comment by: Richard F. (San Diego, CA)
Excellent! Nice work -- I appreciate all efforts to give creative people their due recognition, no matter how overdue. Thanks. BTW, nice tie -)
Monday September 24th 2012, 8:12 AM
Comment by: Grace C. (Waynesville, OH)
Great article. By using emoticons we are often assuming our readers can't or won't figure out the sentiment behind the words and feel we need to dumb-it-down a little, or take the edge off of it. Although, I realize we also use emoticons to reflect a deeper response or, as in Nabokov's case, the only response one need give to some questions.

I use them myself on occasion but I would be :-( if Mark Twain had used them in his work. The most interesting and delightful aspect of his writing is the tongue-in-cheek sarcasm embedded in the words and storylines themselves as his points out human and cultural foibles.

It seems as though emoticons are becoming part of a more visual, faster-paced language evolution, or what many might consider a devolution, as represented by texting, Twitter, FB, etc. about which we can feel :-) or :-( or :-|.
Monday September 24th 2012, 1:36 PM
Comment by: Jan P. (Arnhem Netherlands)
Tuesday October 2nd 2012, 11:44 AM
Comment by: Yasmeen D.
hi every one
Tuesday October 9th 2012, 2:07 PM
Comment by: Rahul S.
A great article. :)
Wednesday October 10th 2012, 8:25 AM
Comment by: Meredith C. (Murfreesboro, TN)
I'm grateful to Mr. Zimmer for showing me that the idea of the happy face in writing isn't nearly as new as I thought. I use emoticons in writing because I realized a long time ago that emails are very much "in your face" and can cause hurt feelings when they weren't meant to. Writing seems so flat on FB and Twitter, so I want my friends to know that I'm kidding. Or that I'm sad about something--or even mad. And because most of our fast-paced communication is fairly recent, I believed the emoticons were as well. I love being enlightened! :o)
Tuesday October 30th 2012, 4:50 PM
Comment by: poriferaTheif
I shall now proceed to show my enjoyment of this article. :3c :L 38D }:)

I had no idea that there was a sideways parenthesis that existed! I wish that I could find this in my Word so I could use it. And I shall use it as liberally as possible!
Friday November 2nd 2012, 12:50 PM
Comment by: anoushka A.
30th anniversary of emoticons......
Friday March 22nd 2013, 5:54 AM
Comment by: Frederick E.
The info is as delightful as the Emoticons themselves, to know they have been so long (already) in the making/appreciated.

To me their value lie not in emphasising an intended emotion of a written word/sentence (for the benefit of slow comprehension ), it lies in the UNwritten statement, when, especially at the end of a message, one merely wants the reader to share in the writer's emotion at time of penning. Regards, Frederick :-)

Do you have a comment?

Share it with the Visual Thesaurus community.

Your comments:

Sign in to post a comment!

We're sorry, you must be a subscriber to comment.

Click here to subscribe today.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login.