Word Routes

Exploring the pathways of our lexicon

The Un-Believable Un-Verb

This past Sunday I had the opportunity to fill in once again for William Safire's "On Language" column in the New York Times Magazine. This time I focused on how the prefix un- is getting pressed into service for all sorts of new verbs — particularly in the novel lingo of social networking, where following, friending, and favoriting can be instantly reversed by unfollowing, unfriending, and unfavoriting.

Word Routes readers will know that these new un-verbs have been an interest of mine since writing back in May on the language of social media. The "On Language" guest column allowed me to probe further into the history of the un- prefix. In the column, I write:

Ever since Old English, the un- prefix has come in two basic flavors. It can be used like the word "not" to negate adjectives (unkind, uncertain, unfair) and the occasional noun (unreason, unrest, unemployment). Or it can attach to a verb to indicate the reversal of an action (unbend, unfasten, unmask).

Actually, that's a bit of an oversimplification. Yale linguist Laurence Horn, my trusty guide through the thickets of un-, points out that in Old English the two flavors corresponded to two distinct prefixes. On the one hand there was the negative prefix un- (etymologically related to German un-, Latin in-, and Greek a[n]-), and on the other hand there was the reversative prefix on(d)- (related to German ent- and Greek anti-). These two prefixes merged into one form, un-, and they've been semantically intertwined ever since.

So the new un-verbs that I discuss as typifying "The Age of Undoing" owe their legacy to the old reversative prefix on(d)-. But the other prefix in Old English, negative un-, could negate not just adjectives and nouns but some verbs too: unbe, unbecome, and unhappen are all attested in Old English with simple negative meanings ('not be,' 'not become,' 'not happen'). By the Middle English era of Chaucer, these negative verbs had faded away, so unlove (used by Chaucer in his poem Troilus and Criseyde) didn't have the meaning 'not to love' (negative) but rather 'come to no longer love' (reversative). And this is the type of unloving that has been handed down to modern-day country singers like Lynn Anderson ("How Can I Unlove You?").

There's one very peculiar register of Modern English when un-verbs have been used as simple negatives, akin to Old English unbe, unbecome, and unhappen. In the days when newspaper reporters filed their stories by cable telegram, they had to conserve the number of words used per message (something like Twitter's 140-character limit today). So the reporters would write their dispatches in a compressed code known as "cable-ese" or "telex language," which would then have to be decompressed by the editors back in the home office. As Douglas Starr recently told Wendalyn Nichols on her Copyediting blog, one trick used by Associated Press correspondents was attaching un- to verbs to mean 'not':

So, to save words — and money — and to prevent omitting not from stories, the AP combined words, and the rewrite desk in New York made the sentences read normally. It was like this. Instead of "does not have": "unhas." Instead of "does not know": "unknows." And "unwants," "unplans," "unwent," "unsaid," and so on.

It wasn't just the AP that used these negative un-verbs. Such cable-ese was well-known enough that the budding young newsman Charles Kuralt, while he was a student at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, used this insider jargon in playful letters to his friend Ken McClure. The website Remembering Charles Kuralt reproduces one of these letters (from May 1954), which begins:


And later on, Kuralt writes:


These journalistic un-verbs even survive in the current digital age, long after reporters' cables have gone the way of the dodo. Ed Keer wrote on the American Dialect Society mailing list a few years ago that a friend of his at a "major news organization" says the shorthand is still used for internal communication: "'Unhave India-Tsunami, pls resend.' means 'I don't have the India-Tsunami story, please resend it.'" Occasionally this shorthand slips into public view: the photo service Getty Images sometimes accidentally leaves "unhave name" in a caption for someone whose name is unknown. That sort of error is, dare I say it, un-forgivable.

Rate this article:

Click here to read more articles from Word Routes.

Ben Zimmer is language columnist for The Wall Street Journal and former language columnist for The Boston Globe and The New York Times Magazine. He has worked as editor for American dictionaries at Oxford University Press and as a consultant to the Oxford English Dictionary. In addition to his regular "Word Routes" column here, he contributes to the group weblog Language Log. He is also the chair of the New Words Committee of the American Dialect Society. Click here to read more articles by Ben Zimmer.

Join the conversation

Comments from our users:

Monday September 21st 2009, 9:19 AM
Comment by: Bruce (Florence, SC)
Ben, I like your piece on the "unword". This would make a useful template for "in-", "a-", "ad-", and so on.
Thursday September 24th 2009, 7:35 PM
Comment by: catwalker (Ottawa Canada)
I have often wondered myself about the two forms of "un" verbs. And what about the false opposites that one often hears: "unthaw" and "unpeel" leap to mind, but I'm sure there are others.
Tuesday October 13th 2009, 9:23 AM
Comment by: Fusun A. (Brossard Canada)
Yes, I understand the slip up of the "unhave name" in a caption for someone whose name is unknown. Unfortunately, with today's speed and rush almost anything is possible even from the most unexpected and reliable sources.

One of my pet peeves is coming across the use of the apostrophe in the simple present form of a verb in the singular third person. Anyone out there agree's or concur's? :o)

Tuesday October 13th 2009, 5:47 PM
Comment by: Gabrielle T. (Sydney Australia)
when transcribing oral history stories I notice a habit people have of endlessly using the same 'fill-in' three words (in terms of)at every opportunity, it is annoying and unnecessary - verbal pollution, so I've inserted into autocorrect 'ito', to obviate the need of prcessing it so many times. GT

Do you have a comment?

Share it with the Visual Thesaurus community.

Your comments:

Sign in to post a comment!

We're sorry, you must be a subscriber to comment.

Click here to subscribe today.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login.

Social media sites like Twitter and Facebook have spawned a language of their own.
"Fail" for the Win!
How "fail" has been transformed from a verb to an interjection and a noun.
"Fail" Ever Upwards
Ben Zimmer follows up his "On Language" column about "fail" with an interview on the NPR show Fast Forward.