Sustainability Vocabulary

The Ecological Footprint has emerged as one of the world’s leading measures of human demand on nature.

The Ecological Footprint represents the productive area required to provide the renewable resources humanity is using and to absorb its waste.

image
Our current global situation: Since the 1970s, humanity has been in ecological overshoot with annual demand on resources exceeding what Earth can regenerate each year.

Overshoot is a vastly underestimated threat to human well-being and the health of the planet, and one that is not adequately addressed.

We maintain this overshoot by liquidating the Earth’s resources.

Simply put, Ecological Footprint Accounting addresses whether the planet is large enough to keep up the demands of humanity.

The productive area currently occupied by human infrastructure is also included in this calculation, since built-up land is not available for resource regeneration.

On the asset side, biocapacity represents the planet’s biologically productive land areas including our forests, pastures, cropland and fisheries.

Conceived in 1990 by Mathis Wackernagel and William Rees at the University of British Columbia, the Ecological Footprint is now in wide use by scientists, businesses, governments, agencies, individuals, and institutions working to monitor ecological resource use and advance sustainable development.

Human activities consume resources and produce waste, and as our populations grow and global consumption increases, it is essential that we measure nature’s capacity to meet these demands.

Overshoot is a vastly underestimated threat to human well-being and the health of the planet, and one that is not adequately addressed.

On the asset side, biocapacity represents the planet’s biologically productive land areas including our forests, pastures, cropland and fisheries.

These areas, especially if left unharvested, can also absorb much of the waste we generate, especially our carbon emissions.

The productive area currently occupied by human infrastructure is also included in this calculation, since built-up land is not available for resource regeneration.

By measuring the Footprint of a population—an individual, city, business, nation, or all of humanity—we can assess our pressure on the planet, which helps us manage our ecological assets more wisely and take personal and collective action in support of a world where humanity lives within the Earth’s bounds.

On the asset side, biocapacity represents the planet’s biologically productive land areas including our forests, pastures, cropland and fisheries.

Human activities consume resources and produce waste, and as our populations grow and global consumption increases, it is essential that we measure nature’s capacity to meet these demands.

On the asset side, biocapacity represents the planet’s biologically productive land areas including our forests, pastures, cropland and fisheries.

image
Our current global situation: Since the 1970s, humanity has been in ecological overshoot with annual demand on resources exceeding what Earth can regenerate each year.

Conceived in 1990 by Mathis Wackernagel and William Rees at the University of British Columbia, the Ecological Footprint is now in wide use by scientists, businesses, governments, agencies, individuals, and institutions working to monitor ecological resource use and advance sustainable development.