Word Routes

Exploring the pathways of our lexicon

Buzzword Watch: "Acq-hire"

Earlier this month, a post by Dan Frommer on Business Insider had this to say about Google, Facebook and Apple: "Recently, all three companies have been making a lot of 'acq-hires,' where they buy a company to acquire its human resources." You read that right: acq-hire. Where did this odd word come from?

If you don't read online news covering the Web 2.0 business world, chances are you've never run across acq-hire. But the term has developed a modest following among technobloggers — sometimes hyphenated, sometimes not:

MediaMemo: "The paper puts a $10 million price tag on the deal, which would make it one of the 'acq-hires' that Google does with great frequency these days."

TechCrunch: "Most likely these were more acqhires where the talent was being bought more so than the underlying products."

GigaOM: "The small deal — an 'acq-hire' of a company with relatively little funding and few employees — fits in with Facebook's deal-making history."

It also gets used as a verb:

Connected Social Media: "Geek Entertainment Television have been 'acq-hired' by PodTech.net."

paidContent: "Google Buys Social Search Startup Angstro, Acq-Hires Co-Founder Khare"

Business Insider: "The team behind Brizzly, one of the better Twitter apps out there, is reportedly being acq-hired by AOL."

Sometimes, rather than acqhire or acq-hire, it gets spelled as acquhire or acqu-hire:

GigaOM: "These are multimillion-dollar acquhires."

TelecomPaper: "Google's 'acquhires' to enhance portfolio."

Mobile Dev Zone: "Motorola Acqu-Hires Cappuccino Developers."

Very often it's impossible to find out where a newly coined word first came from, but in this case we can trace all of the variants back to a blog post by Rex Hammock on May 11, 2005. In that post he introduced acqhire (no hyphen, no "u") and defined it thusly: "When a large company 'purchases' a small company with no employees other than its founders, typically to obtain some special talent or a cool concept." Om Malik of GigaOM immediately picked up on it, and the blog that he oversees became a proponent of the word (though, as seen above, they're not too sure how to spell it).

Hammock hasn't hidden the fact that he's been trying to work acqhire into the tech/biz lexicon. In December 2006 he used it as a verb ("I believe Microsoft has just acqhired a media brand"), and then said of the term, "I've been trying to turn it into a buzzword for a long time." Now, more than five years after he first used it, we can see that the coinage has made some strides among one sector of the blogosphere, but it hasn't progressed much beyond that. Perhaps that's because of its strange look, blending acquire and hire into a word that is head-scratchingly difficult to spell and to pronounce. (I assume it's meant to be pronounced "ack-hire.")

Despite the word's peculiarity, it apparently predates Hammock's baptismal post, though used in a different way. The company Development Dimensions International, Inc. filed a registered trademark for "Acqhire" in October 2004, some seven months before showing up on Hammock's blog. The trademark listing says it's for "business consulting services directed to assisting employers to improve the selection criteria for hiring employees," and DDI's website further explains that it is "a totally integrated, end-to-end solution that helps you make more accurate, cost-efficient hiring and promotion decisions."

What do you think of acqhire as a buzzword? Does this ungainly concoction have any chance of breaking out into wider usage? Share your thoughts in the comments below!


Rate this article:

Click here to read more articles from Word Routes.

Ben Zimmer is executive producer of the Visual Thesaurus and Vocabulary.com. He is language columnist for The Wall Street Journal and former language columnist for The Boston Globe and The New York Times Magazine. He has worked as editor for American dictionaries at Oxford University Press and as a consultant to the Oxford English Dictionary. In addition to his regular "Word Routes" column here, he contributes to the group weblog Language Log. He is also the chair of the New Words Committee of the American Dialect Society. Click here to read more articles by Ben Zimmer.

Join the conversation

Comments from our users:

Tuesday September 28th 2010, 7:05 AM
Comment by: Jane B. (Winnipeg Canada)Top 10 Commenter
Words seem to come into existence in many ways: simple joining of two, as with 'acq-hire', formation from Latin parts (or Greek) for science or not, as with 'absquatulate', regional words, words that stumble from mouths working away in a hurry, 'refudiate' or malapropisms.

Whether they live on or not depends on acceptance.

Acqhire seems to me to break that 'qu' rule in English words, almost a mid-eastern import. It's also awkward to say, much more so than refudiate which was mocked.

And finally, it is too near in usage to acquire, just a sort of cantish combination meant for use by THE FEW.

I guess you might say I don't like it! LOL

I'll await other opinions.
Tuesday September 28th 2010, 9:29 AM
Comment by: Edward A. (New York, NY, NY)
This word seems to have potential staying power. It describes something, an activity, that has been around much longer than the term.

I remember reading in the business press 20+ years ago about companies acquiring another company as a way to get some group of employees under their employ. In at least one case they wanted the sales force.

But... it's rather unwieldy to say, so may just stay on the blogs.
Tuesday September 28th 2010, 10:50 AM
Comment by: Mark A. (Bexley, OH)
It's an awkward construction, especially with the hyphen, and it doesn't serve a solid purpose not covered by "acquire." I would not recommend this on the Nonce Futures Market, but I might try to get away with it in Scrabble (along with "absquatulate.").
Tuesday September 28th 2010, 1:05 PM
Comment by: Zez (Fredericksburg, VA)
It's just too ugly.
Tuesday September 28th 2010, 2:58 PM
Comment by: Jane B. (Winnipeg Canada)Top 10 Commenter
Either one of those might get you a lot of points, Mark!

I do think that acq-hire has a limited life, with some business types. It's not very pretty!
Wednesday September 29th 2010, 8:19 AM
Comment by: Erin B. (Haverhill, MA)Visual Thesaurus Contributor
Yuck! It has an odd pronunciation and is too close to "acquire." I hope it goes away!
Friday October 1st 2010, 4:17 PM
Comment by: Steve W. (Piscataway, NJ)
It's too ugly a word to live. I can't hear it without thinking of Bill the Cat's catch phrase: "Ack!"

Do you have a comment?

Share it with the Visual Thesaurus community.

Your comments:

Sign in to post a comment!

We're sorry, you must be a subscriber to comment.

Click here to subscribe today.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login.

In business lingo, words can diverge wildly from their common meanings.
How to avoid buzzwords, popular industry words that people use to impress others.
Getting "Social"
- 7 Comments
New meanings of "social"? Let me socialize that.