Word Routes
Exploring the pathways of our lexicon
Eponyms in the Making?
Every now and then, a prominent person achieves so much notoriety that his or her name enters the language as an eponym. Massachusetts Governor Elbridge Gerry gave us gerrymander, after carving a salamander-shaped electoral district that favored his party in 1812. Major Vidkun Quisling was a Norwegian officer who collaborated with the Germans during World War II, so quisling came to mean "a traitor to one's country." And when Robert Bork's nomination to the Supreme Court was quashed in 1987, it was said that he got Borked by his opponents. Now there are a couple of names in the news that just might lend themselves to new eponyms.
First up is Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich. Last week, David Letterman joked that he had been charged with "one count of bribery, one count of fraud and one count of Blagojeviching." That led the Chicago Tribune to ponder whether Blagojeviching could "really become part of the lexicon." I'm quoted in the Tribune as answering in the negative, on the grounds that the name is just too hard to say (especially if you try to add a verb ending like -ed or -ing). Now, if you shorten it to Blag or Blago, then there are some possibilities for good eponyms. We could say Blagojevich got Blagged when he was caught in the act of trying to sell the Illinois Senate seat, or that a similarly corrupt politician is Blaggish. Some have even found a name for the surreal world inhabited by the governor: the Blago-sphere.
Next up: fund manager Bernard Madoff, who has been accused of fraud involving investments in the neighborhood of $50 billion. Reuters reports that Madoff's name is already being used for puns, as in "He Made-off with my money." But could Madoff come to describe the fraud that he allegedly committed? It's unlikely, because there's already an eponym for that: a Ponzi scheme, defined as "an investment swindle in which high profits are promised from fictitious sources and early investors are paid off with funds raised from later ones." We owe that term to Charles Ponzi, an Italian-born speculator who organized a notorious scheme in 1919 and 1920. As Merriam-Webster editor Peter Sokolowski told Reuters, it's doubtful Madoff will ever make it far in the eponym races, "because we've already got a strong word, Ponzi."
Do you think either Blagojevich or Madoff will be remembered eponymously, or are there other contemporary newsmakers who stand a better chance of getting in the dictionaries? If you'd like to peruse more eponyms, check out the wordlist I created here. And the Language Lounge has some advice for turning your own name into an eponym here.


Join the conversation:
Post a comment at the bottom
That said, Palenized truly takes my fancy. It could describe Andy Worhol's "15 minutes of fame" combined with the belief that the fame is warranted.
To palin someone would be to lift that person into celebrity for reasons other than ability. It seems to me quite a number of people, in politics and pop music for example, have been palined.
On the other hand, in the examples cited by Ben (gerrymander and quisling) there seems to be something more - something in the word itself that hints at the behavior being named. 'Gerrymander' seems almost too obvious, with its homonym connection to "jerry" (constructing something unsubstantially and of bad materials), and its use of "man", suggesting a link to 'manipulate' or 'manufacture'. Quisling may be less obvious, but isn't there just something about the man's name itself that sounds like a sly quitter? Even Bork, with its one hard short syllable, hints at the cursory dismissal accorded to the would be judge.
Each of Blagojevich, Madoff and Palin just doesn't seem to contain the elusive element, whatever it may be, that would hint at their respective behaviors with sufficient adhesion to make the name stick to that behavior in our minds.
Still, it seems that eponyms take root in the language only when there is a strong association of some kind.
There must have been hundreds, perhaps thousands of turncoats during the Second World War, not to mention all those earlier wars in our history. Yet Quisling somehow stands out as the eponymous traitor. Why him, and none of the others?
Bork was not the first man to be curtly dismissed in a job interview, but somehow the action stuck to his name, in a way that it hadn't adhered to any one before him.
Your fascinating list of 480 something eponyms might make a good starting place for discovery of the elusive quality that makes them work. Thanks for that, too.
Alan Mulally of Ford
Robert Nardelli of Chrysler
Richard Wagoner of GM